Related Articles
Mar 26, 2024
OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASE: https://www.prweb.com/releases/fighting-back-the-battle-between-meta-facebook-and-curios-over-open-meta-trademark-302098463.html
As the CEO of Curios, I find myself unexpectedly embroiled in a battle against a corporate giant: Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly known as Facebook). It all began when Facebook decided to rebrand itself, adopting the name "Meta Platforms, Inc." (MPI) in an apparent effort to distance itself from its past controversies. However, what followed was a concerning attempt by Meta to assert ownership over the term "META," globally, a term deeply ingrained in the digital landscape.
Meta's actions, intimidating users and attempting to monopolize a common term, represent a classic case of corporate bullying. It's a situation where the power and resources of a behemoth like Meta vastly outweigh those of smaller entities like Curios.
But, we refuse to back down.
The term "META" holds significant meaning in computer science and digital technology. Companies have been using it to describe their products and services long before Meta's rebranding efforts. Think of phrases like "META DATA," "METAVERSE," "META TAGS," "METALANGUAGE," and "META FILE." These terms are integral to the digital realm, and no single entity should claim exclusive rights over them.
Meta has been aggressively pursuing trademark actions against various companies, including Curios, that have used the term "META" in their branding. They've filed opposition proceedings, alleging a "likelihood of confusion" between these marks and their own rebranded name. Many smaller companies have succumbed to Meta's pressure, surrendering their trademarks to avoid costly legal battles.
However, Curios is taking a stand against Meta's bullying tactics. We refuse to relinquish our trademark for "OPEN META." The U.S. Trademark Office approved our application, recognizing the descriptive nature of the term "META." We firmly believe that no single entity should monopolize such a common and widely-used term.
Our trademark attorney, Daniel M. Cislo, Esq., echoes this sentiment, stating that Meta should not be allowed to steal a common word simply because it desires a name change. Instead, Meta should be held accountable for its past actions.
Despite the daunting odds, Curios remains steadfast in defending our trademark. We refuse to let Meta strip away the rights of all those who use the term "META" in their businesses and endeavors.
This battle goes beyond individual companies; it speaks to broader issues of fairness, competition, and freedom of speech. The term "META" belongs to the digital community as a whole, not to a single corporate entity. We urge all stakeholders to join us in voicing opposition to Meta's trademark tactics.
Together, we can ensure that the term "META" remains accessible to all, safeguarding the principles of fairness and free speech in the digital age. Join us in defending Open Meta against corporate overreach.